June 13, 2012
A small sign of the times...
May 18, 2012
...a battle worth fighting, nonetheless
![]() |
Rocky Mountain Pine Beetle |
December 31, 2010
Terry Cemetery area targeted
September 4, 2010
Accepting the Journal's "Page Too"
May 23, 2010
Seat belts and your money
Good friend Roger Whorton has written in the past about health care, offering a very personal perspective. Here’s another topic which Roger takes personally: seat belts. In the long wake following a public debate on the topic last year, Roger returns to Black Hills Monitor and shares this pithy piece he sent to the
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has released statistics for 2006. Seatbelt use saved the lives of 15,383 people. Since 1975, belts have saved 226,567 folks.
One was our daughter, so I take personal interest.
Drivers who do not wear seatbelts are costing you money. Accidents involving those not wearing seat belts cost the U.S. $20 billion per year, and their hospital costs are 50% higher than patients who use belts. You, the taxpayer, pay 74% of the tab.
About 28% of
I’ve heard the arguments saying seatbelts should be a personal choice, but not when not using belts is costing all of us money, and killing young people.
Are we now turning down $5.2 million in federal funds that could be used for road improvement, if we do not allow police to stop motorists not wearing seatbelts? Sometimes the feds push us into doing something because they know it is for the public good, and will save money and lives.
Why would any legislator or the RCJ be against that?
January 27, 2010
Ink for needless art
January 21, 2010
Fighting "...irrational negativity"
This has been an interesting week.
The Denver Post’s parent company has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The New York Times is positioned to start charging for its on-line content. And the Rapid City Journal’s owner – Lee Enterprises – reports revenues for 2009 dropped by 18.2 percent.


“Through intense collaboration, our editors redesigned our pages to a reduced width of 11 inches, gaining approval from readers and advertisers,” Junck wrote. That move helped Lee shave newsprint usage by 31 percent.
Interestingly, Lee has launched a public relations campaign to combat what Junck called the continuing, “irrational negativity” about the future of newspapers.

Perhaps Singleton and Junck – and many newspaper executives have been talking with one another about how to paint a rosier picture.
To be sure, we’re hopeful that newspapers can re-invent themselves into a sustainable product that endures for years to come. Perhaps I’m old fashioned (perhaps??!!) but thumbing through and reading the morning paper is a joy I don’t want to give up.
On-line news just isn’t quite as cathartic. Especially if you have to pay for it, after having enjoyed free access to the New York Times for such a long time. One of the last holdouts offering free access to its on-line version, the Times will likely announce within the next few weeks exactly how it expects to monetize its on-line services.
We support charging for these services. But exactly how such fees are assessed and at what level will be a challenge. We like the “tease” approach being used by the Black Hills Pioneer (a Seaton publication), whereby you can read a paragraph or two – and possibly enjoy a photo – before being prompted to click a link to “…read more.” That’s when readers can subscribe to the full-meal deal and read the entire paper on-line.
On-line journalism is likely to continue to grow. We trust it will also get significantly better. If newspapers can survive and then thrive in a modified form, that would be a good thing, giving us some choices.
For now, we’re entrenched with one foot in the print world and one in the on-line world. We can live with that.
August 1, 2009
More bad news for Lee

The company is based in Davenport, Iowa.
In earlier postings about Lee, we noted that they were going through many of the same kinds of problems being encountered by virtually all of the newspaper industry. There were layoffs at many of their properties in Wyoming, South Dakota and Montana.
We paid $2.00 for a Wall Street Journal yesterday and observed that USA Today, the Gannett property started by South Dakotan Al Neuharth, now goes for $1.00 a copy. These hefty newsstand prices do little to offset the record losses being endured by papers across the country.
Leveraging new acquisitions on the backs of papers that are doing well has been a common woe among several big newspaper chains – including Lee Enterprises. It’s something of a “local” chain, and we’re sorry they’ve fallen victim to this trend.
We love newspapers and hope Lee is able to fend off its own demise. But the prognosis is not good.
January 8, 2009
No local owner -- and no local sports

Clearly, lots of folks in the Rapid City area are ready for more sports broadcasting, and absentee-owned KRKI is delivering it. Nordbye quoted KRKI program director Lonnie Glasford as saying that only national programming will air on the station, which is found at 99.5 on the FM dial. They "hope" to add local programming in the future.

ESPN is a well-established brand, and they've done well in satiating the appetites of folks who can't get enough sports.
But KRKI's desire to become an "up-to-the minute source" for local sports will fall flat, unless and until they can add that local component. Stations like KOTA in Rapid City and KDSJ in Deadwood (although it fails miserably on local news coverage) have demonstrated what it takes to become sports leaders in broadcasting.
Localism remains the key to long-term survival, a reality that KRKI owner and entrepreneur Victor Michael (Colorado's Michael Radio Group) doesn't seem to embrace.
January 5, 2009
Lee stock in the tank

Lee owns 49 daily newspapers, and its poor financial showing means that it has fallen below standards necessary to be listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Business Week reports that Lee plans to announce a strategy within the next 10 days that would allow them to keep their NYSE listing. Being forced to trade over-the-counter would be a severe black-eye for the firm, which continues to struggle with lower advertising revenues and declining circulation numbers.
Nonetheless, Lee officials say their circulation numbers are not as bad as the rest of the industry, which has seen a decline of some 20% over the past year.
Despite my arm-chair criticism of some practices at the Rapid City Journal – and the fact that I’ve become a habitual user of internet services – I’m hoping that Lee Enterprises and the Rapid City Journal will get through these difficult times.
November 27, 2008
Who failed?

With all the changes at the Journal over the past 36 months, it’s good to see them sticking to their editorial guns when it comes to open meetings.
And then there’s the school district.
According to the Journal, a group of local leaders was selected by the school district to review district financial affairs and make recommendations to the board. That’s a smart proactive thing to be doing in these tough economic times. Dave Janak, budget manager for the district, is reportedly consulting with the committee and is quoted as saying that the committee is “an arm of our office.” Our hats off to these business folks taking time to help the school district.
We’ve often noted that it’s a whole heck of a lot easier to do business outside the view of the media and the public. But it’s dangerous for the institutions to work with that mindset – and even more dangerous for the public. That’s why we have open meetings laws. There are ample provisions for conducting closed meetings -- personnel, legal, and other sensitive topics – but invoking them should be rare.
Most troubling are the remarks by Superintendent Peter Wharton, indirectly quoted in the Rapid City Journal, that he has no say in whether the public is allowed into the meetings. It sounds to me like he may have shortchanged the committee on guidance regarding their work and how to accomplish it legally.
And committee chairman Dennis Popp says the group isn’t elected and doesn’t represent anybody. Usually, school superintendents and chiefs of police aren’t elected either, but they’re required to do the public’s business….in public!
A retired school superintendent friend of mine said it best when I asked him how many folks would likely attend a public meeting of a financial review committee: “Nobody.”
By closing the meetings, the district and the committee have caused us to wonder why.
The Journal quotes Popp as saying “we don’t feel it would be fair to give the recommendations to the media before the board.”
Mr. Popp should understand that the “media” are something of a surrogate for the public, and this is not an issue of fairness to the board. It’s about the law and conducting business within the healthy view of the citizens served by the school district.
November 23, 2008
Advertising declines...

But in this instance, “mounting debt and a sharp drop in advertising” characterizes another struggling media enterprise: commercial radio. Unlike the declining circulation of newspapers, however, radio listening -- according to a recent New York Times article -- is actually increasing. Nonetheless, the radio business seems to be struggling big time.
One of the giants of the industry, Citadel Broadcasting, reportedly has laid off 340 people this year, while CBS Radio has chopped 480 staffers. Another radio conglomerate, Emmis Communications, has reduced its staff by 480.
Of course, most of the impact has been in large metropolitan areas, but heartland radio operations are not impervious to these tough economic times. Competition from other technologies – iPods to satellite radio – is taking its toll.
Readers of this site know of our affection for local broadcast services, and we've often waxed nasty about margers and consolidations. We get little solace from the likelihood that media consolidation costs likely caused some of the radio giants to go deeper into debt as they tried to gorge themselves with even more radio stations.
Again, locally-owned and operated stations are certainly not immune to marketplace vagaries, but good local management can help stave off some of the traps that the big guys have fallen into.
A looming challenge for all the radio industry: what to do about digital radio? That’ll have to be the subject of another session
May 9, 2008
Looking for world news

In general, television news has become increasingly glitzier and full of fluff – but that’s nothing new. Radio news, except from public radio, is on the endangered species list. And newspapers have shriveled news content perceivably, particularly world news.
Most of us now acknowledge that we live in a global economy – but you’d never know it reading the front page of the Rapid City Journal.
Never mind that tens of thousands of people were killed by a cyclone in Myanmar this past week. In the minds-eye of the Journal, that story wasn’t worth putting on the front page. Instead, we found stories about:
· Hillary Clinton speaking at a Sioux Falls airport hangar
· A non-fatal vehicle accident in north Rapid City
· Students making pancakes for Teacher Appreciation Week
· Retailers baiting shoppers with rebate specials
· A tourism consultant focusing on “locals” for a city makeover
· An enticement for the Journal’s newest feature – “Page Too”
The front page of the Journal did an excellent job covering the blizzard that wreaked havoc on much of western South Dakota, and other important stories with decidedly “local” angles. But if Christ were to make a second coming, it would be relegated below the fold on page 7.
After considerable public outcry, Journal editors appear to have eliminated the routine front-page placement of area sporting activities and relocated it to the front-page of the sports section. Good move.
Now if they’d only acknowledge that world events deserve a shot at front-page coverage.
The subtle relegation of important world news to the back of the paper is like being shoved to the back of the bus. If it’s out-of-sight, it soon becomes out-of-mind. And a whole new generation of young Americans will continue to know the floor plans of most U.S. Wal-Marts, but won’t have a clue about what’s going on in the rest of the world.
April 17, 2008
Where's "the rest of the story"?
Earmarks tend to avoid the rigors and scrutiny of the budget process, and they are far more subject to the whims of individual senators and representatives – particularly those in power. That’s why it seems half of the public construction initiatives in West Virginia are named for Senator Robert Byrd.
“Whims,” of course, can be a part of political horse-trading. A less delicate way of describing them would be political pay-offs.
Even when visiting the Congressional Pig Book web site, which is stuffed with information about questionable earmarks, I am surprised at the apparent legitimacy of many projects. Certainly, most of those described in the Rapid City Journal seem worthy of funding – particularly to us South Dakotans.
But what about projects that smack blatantly of favoritism and appear to be highly questionable? Just how do they compare with projects that were "cut" from the formal budgeting process?
Perhaps the Rapid City Journal would do well to dig a bit deeper on all earmarks within their circulation area. At the very least, explore the “short-cut” process that goes with earmarks, and shine a bit of journalistic light upon this unsavory process.
March 31, 2008
Harlan & Daly: Better odds in Deadwood?
Alas, Dan is the latest in a long list of Journal news people over the past few years who’ve announced they’re leaving the paper. He’s off to join TDG Communications, Inc., an ad agency in Deadwood, where he'll be their Director of Public Relations, according to a piece last week in the Black Hills Pioneer.
As one would expect of a professional, Dan has no unkind words for the Journal. That speaks volumes about Dan, whose work has graced the pages of the Journal since 1990. In Deadwood, he'll likely cross paths with another Rapid City Journal escapee, Bill Harlan, who left the paper earlier this year to go to work at the Sanford Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory.
Since Karen and I retired and returned to South Dakota three years ago, we’ve enjoyed Dan’s “Talking Business” column, and I’ve also picked up a lot of background information and perspectives from the Daily Business Blog. We'll miss seeing his work in print and on-line.
Good luck, Dan Daly; best wishes in your new career with TDG Communications.
February 21, 2008
Behind Closed Doors

Apparently that’s what happened this week in Pierre when the House State Affairs Committee, chaired by Representative Larry Rhoden of Union Center, heard open testimony from six proponents of SB 189. They also listened to a single opponent, Jeff Bloomberg of the Bureau of Administration. The measure had already passed the Senate with bipartisan support.
Bloomberg’s last minute sandbag job in the House committee probably wasn’t even necessary. We’ve been told that a closed caucus of House Republicans – days earlier – allowed lobbyists against the bill to wax eloquent in their opposition. When the Wednesday morning public hearing came, SB 189 was pushed to the back of the committee agenda, allowing Chairman Rhoden to frequently chide proponents to hurry along with their testimony because of the “tight schedule.” Despite crossover Republican support, the bill was stopped cold on a 7-6 vote.
Black Hills Monitor has often criticized the Rapid City Journal, and we’re not always a big fan of the Argus-Leader. Alas, this seemed to be more of a grudge match between the Argus-Leader and Governor Mike Rounds. The Governor won this round. The media got its ears pinned back.
But the real loser was open government and the people of South Dakota.
While virtually all other states have modernized their laws with a presumption of openness for public documents, South Dakota continues to muddle along with a restrictive and confusing set of laws. SB 189 was a good measure, championed by Senator Nancy Turbak Berry of Watertown. Proponents promise to be bring the issue back next year.

Perhaps our biggest disappointment was with Rep. Chuck Turbiville of Deadwood. Our conversations with him led us to believe that he would give the measure a fair hearing. In retrospect, we didn’t know that a “fair hearing” would include a closed GOP caucus meeting with die-hard opponents of the bill.
It was a sad day for open government.
December 23, 2007
Newspaper Videos Blossom
Shawn has spent most of the past four months recuperating at the Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio. He’s been going through some aggressive physical therapy, and this video provided some good news for family members far and wide. The production quality of the video won’t win any awards, but it was still good news.
And these kinds of videos may also be good news for the newspaper industry. As the Fifth Estate becomes more adept at using video, perhaps they’ll also land upon a business model that will allow them to continue and expand creative uses of video and other internet tools.
Last week, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Kevin Martin, pushed through a new media ownership rule. It will allow newspapers to own television stations in the largest markets of the country. It’s a dumb idea. There already is too much concentration of power within the media.
Chairman Martin waxed eloquent about the plight of newspapers, citing significant declines in subscriptions to many well-known dailies. He neglected to mention that despite such declines, profits within the newspaper industry remain quite high, thank you very much!
While I’m opposed to the kind of increased concentration promoted by the cross-ownership rule, I fully support the blossoming video activities being pursued by newspapers and reported extensively in a recent article in the American Journalism Review.
Even the Rapid City Journal has been getting into the game of late. I find their video offerings -- categorized under "Multimedia" to the right side of their on-line news page -- a bit sparse. The interface is a bit awkward, but I suspect that they’re still taking baby steps with the new technology. Look for them to improve over time.
But for those of us who’ve advocated converging technologies to maximize journalistic efforts, this is a move in the right direction.