December 27, 2007

Global Events -- Our Neighborhood, too

How regrettable that it took the death of a charismatic Pakistani leader today to get the U.S. media to pay attention to world events. Beyond coverage of our involvement in the war in Iraq and early campaigning for the U.S. presidency, there really is another world out there.

Continuing strife in Darfur, the growing military might – and pollution – that symbolizes an emerging world power in China, severe human rights violations in much of Latin America…. The list of significant world events seems beyond the reach of American media. Not because they lack the technology, but because the corporate entities that own much of the media lack the will to support coverage beyond their “sales market.” The bottom line reigns supreme.

The circumstances surrounding the suicide bombing that claimed the life of former Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, 54, will be explored heavily today – and maybe tomorrow – by mainstream U.S. media. Then, short of all-out revolution in Pakistan, the topic will ebb away from media consciousness like the tide rolling back out to sea.

Only with Reuters, Deutsche Welle, BBC, and a few other web sites can we expect much meaningful world news. A few print media in our country – the New York Times and the Wall Street Journal among them – help keep us peripherally informed. Alone among domestic broadcasters, NPR and PBS do a good job of covering the globe. In our neck of the woods, we're thankful for South Dakota Public Broadcasting and Wyoming Public Radio. Their stations provide not only excellent coverage of world events -- they also do the best job of broadcasting state/regional news and features.

Would that we could get others to recognize that we’re a part of global community.

December 26, 2007

A Joyous Season

As we celebrate this holiday season, our best wishes go out to all.
May the coming year be a happy one for you all!

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!

December 23, 2007

Newspaper Videos Blossom


We received a most welcome e-mail from our niece in Texas today. It provided an internet link to a video produced by the Lubbock (TX) Avalanche-Journal, telling the story of our grandnephew, Sergeant Shawn Walton, who was seriously wounded earlier this year in Iraq. We posted the video on the Galey Archives family web site.

Shawn has spent most of the past four months recuperating at the Brooke Army Medical Center in San Antonio. He’s been going through some aggressive physical therapy, and this video provided some good news for family members far and wide. The production quality of the video won’t win any awards, but it was still good news.

And these kinds of videos may also be good news for the newspaper industry. As the Fifth Estate becomes more adept at using video, perhaps they’ll also land upon a business model that will allow them to continue and expand creative uses of video and other internet tools.

Last week, the Chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Kevin Martin, pushed through a new media ownership rule. It will allow newspapers to own television stations in the largest markets of the country. It’s a dumb idea. There already is too much concentration of power within the media.

Chairman Martin waxed eloquent about the plight of newspapers, citing significant declines in subscriptions to many well-known dailies. He neglected to mention that despite such declines, profits within the newspaper industry remain quite high, thank you very much!

While I’m opposed to the kind of increased concentration promoted by the cross-ownership rule, I fully support the blossoming video activities being pursued by newspapers and reported extensively in a recent article in the American Journalism Review.

Even the Rapid City Journal has been getting into the game of late. I find their video offerings -- categorized under "Multimedia" to the right side of their on-line news page -- a bit sparse. The interface is a bit awkward, but I suspect that they’re still taking baby steps with the new technology. Look for them to improve over time.
-
Happily, Journal Editor Mikel LeForte told me some time back that the paper plans to continue its emphasis upon print reporting. They view video as merely complementing their print effort. And that’s the way it should be.

But for those of us who’ve advocated converging technologies to maximize journalistic efforts, this is a move in the right direction.

Phish for Christmas?


Whew! I’m a lucky guy.

Without my crack professional friends at “Central Bank,” and the obviously highly-effective spam filtering system at my Internet Service Provider (Prairie Wave) I could be in deep trouble on Christmas Day. My non-existent account could have been suspended! But by following e-mail directions I received this morning from "Central Bank," I can save it.

Here’s their message:

Dear Central Bank customer,

During our regularly scheduled account maintenance and verification procedures, we have detected a slight error in your billing information.

This might be due to either of the following reasons:
1. A recent change in your personal information ( i.e.change of address).
2. Submiting invalid information during the initial sign up process.
3. An inability to accurately verify your selected option of payment due to an internal error within our processors.

Please update and verify your information by folowing this link:

http:/66.48.225.11/~dumb/www.centralbank.com/person/homee/index.php


If your account information is not updated within 48 hours we will be forced to suspend your account indefinitely.

The Central Bank Billing Department .

NOTE: If you received this message in your SPAM/BULK folder, that is because of the restrictions implemented by your ISP.

Thank you for your patience in this matter. We apologize for any inconveniences.
© 1998-2007 Central Bancshares. Disclaimers. Privacy Policy. The USA Patriot Act.

Fortunately, their fears that my ISP (Prairie Wave) might place their urgent message in my SPAM/BULK folder “because of the restrictions implemented by your ISP” were unjustified. Even Central Bank can’t compete with the sophisticated spam filtering system and highly developed technical knowledge of Prairie Wave (after all, they’re now a division of Knology). Prairie Wave’s efficient system looked at it, said….”Gosh, Larry’s just got to have this one” and placed the missive directly into my IN box.

Thank you Prairie Wave. I suspect the folks at Knology might even send a tutor to Central Bank and assist them with their spelling. I mean, some folks might think such a schlocky looking e-mail with misspelled words was Spam. Thank heavens for Prairie Wave.
-
P.S. I altered the URL in their message. I don't want just anyone to benefit from "folowing" the link!

December 19, 2007

The Chinese have a PLAN -- Do We?

Bully! The Wall Street Journal today had a nice opinion piece written by Bret Stephens about "The Great White Fleet" sent around the world by President Teddy Roosevelt in 1907-09. It was Teddy's way of demonstrating to the world that the United States had arrived as a naval power.

Stephens' article is another alarm bell of the wakeup call that doesn't seem to have stirred anyone. He writes, "...a supremely powerful Navy is not a luxury the U.S. can safely dispense with. In September, ships of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) made their first-ever port calls in Germany, France, Britain and Italy, and Chinese admirals are frequent guests on American warships.

He further quotes a senior Navy official as saying "The Chinese Great White Fleet is not too far off on the horizon." In fact, the UK Daily Mail last month reported that U.S. military leaders were "dumbstruck" by an undetected Chinese submarine popping up at the heart of a recent Pacific exercise and close to the aircraft carrier USS Kitty Hawk.

Coupled with unfolding nautical developments in the Middle East, where Russia will soon establish an 11-ship presence in the Mediterranen, led by the carrier Kuznetsov, it appears we have tangible evidence of Sino-Soviet inclinations for bolstering their naval power. If the Iranians then begin operating submarines from a base in Syria, which reportedly has the Israelis on edge, we may begin waking up to the possible radical change in military strength in both the Pacific and Atlantic. Take a look at this UK web site named Chinese Defence Today that outlines growth of the People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN).

I'd like to think that the U.S. Department of Defense and our crack intelligence program (gulp) are on top of things. Lack of media coverage about these unfolding events means that most Americans are probably watching their favorite reality program. We may truly be "asleep at the switch."

December 18, 2007

Merry Christmas, Rupert

Yup. They went ahead and did it. The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) yesterday voted 3-2 to overturn the newspaper/television cross-ownership rule in major markets across the country. Read the summary in the New York Times.

That should make Rupert Murdoch and other media barons very happy. It lets them off the hook in markets where they've been operating under waivers allowing such cross-ownership, and it's sure to open the floodgates of cross-ownership all across America.

It's a sad day for local journalism. But the battle isn't over. A move is afoot in the United States Senate to nail the FCC for its transgression. There aren't many things I get excited about having Congress get its nose into -- but this is one of them. The public airwaves are too important to be left to corporate bean counters trying to squeeze even greater profits out of every market at the expense of the public.

Read the revealing remarks of FCC Commissioners Jonathan Adelstein and Michael Copps. Their two minority votes just couldn't do the job. As you read their comments, it's apparent that much skullduggery has been going on behind the scenes; the Commission has demonstrated institutional ineptness, and I'm still dumbfounded as to why Chairman Kevin Martin launched this death march upon local services. It reached a new low for doing the public's business clandestinely and at the 11th hour....and later.

Kudos to Senator Byron Dorgan of North Dakota and Trent Lott of Mississippi for leading the charge to bring the FCC back to their senses. We're hopeful that South Dakota Senators Tim Johnson and John Thune will join the bi-partisan effort to pass S.2332, the Media Ownership Act of 2007. Among other things, it will correct the sloppy and irresponsible way the FCC conducted their hearings on media ownership. It will also breathe new life into efforts to examine the impact the media consolidation has on local services, and it'll finally give attention to the problem of under-represented minority ownership of broadcasting stations.

Local journalism, a bedrock of our democracy, is in peril. We need to find ways to engender an expansion of local broadcast services, and further media consolidation is not the way to achieve it.

Stay tuned.

To Cling....Or Not to Cling?

Reuters reported yesterday (December 16, 2007) that Cuban Premier Fidel Castro has “hinted that he’ll not cling to power.”

That sounds a bit disingenuous to me, given that Castro has outlived most of his adversaries and has, indeed, clung to power longer than even did the eternal Francisco Franco in Spain.

Forty-four years ago this month, I was stationed at the U.S. Naval Base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, serving an “unaccompanied tour” (without my bride). As program manger for the Armed Forces Radio and Television Station (WGBY) at “Gitmo,” I spent more than a little time eavesdropping on Cuban television programs from the other side of the fence. They consisted mostly of B-grade syndicated programs from
the United States, particularly old cartoons.



But the Cuban airwaves were often filled with revolutionary pronouncements delivered by the fiery revolutionary leader, Fidel Castro. It was not uncommon for us to watch Fidel waxing emotional about a topic – tune out for a few hours – and then return to find him still plugging along.
We called him “Forever Fidel,” referring not to his anticipated tenure as a Cuban leader – which none of us thought would be very long – but rather to his unending stamina before the cameras.


Little could any of us have known that Fidel would still be around nearly a half century later, and still enjoying his role as a political thorn in the side of the United States government. That, despite his ascendancy to revolutionary legend, is likely to be his lasting legacy.

The promises of the revolution in Cuba never came to fruition. Somehow, with his tenacity and cunning, Fidel fortified his power base and…..well….he "clung."

And headlines say he’s “not going to cling to power"? I suspect old Fidel has fallen victim to the ravages of time and change. Age, health, and emerging political realities have loosened the iron-clad grip Fidel Castro has had on Cuba the last half century. And if he's no longer clinging -- it's a result of lost grip -- not lost desire.

-

If Batista could only see him now.

December 17, 2007

Who Wants Bigger Media?

The Federal Communications Commission is scheduled to vote tomorrow on rules that would allow even greater consolidation of media in this country. Specifically, it would allow newspapers in major markets to acquire television stations in those same markets.

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin -- who has some good ideas about giving consumers greater choices by "unbundling" cable television packages -- is way off base on the issue of newspaper/television cross-ownership. I can't fathom whence came the perceived urgency of such rules, but it's not hard to imagine the long and powerful reach of media moguls like Rupert Murdoch.
-
I've contacted Senators Johnson and Thune in South Dakota. While I doubt there is much that can be done at this late date to persuade Chairman Martin and the FCC to delay the vote tomorrow, the Senate can and should come together in support of S.2332, the Media Ownership Act of 2007. Among other things, it would require 90 days be provided for the public to comment on any proposed media ownership rules put forward by the FCC. It would also require a separate FCC proceeding to examine the impact media consolidation is having on localism. It's no surprise to anyone that truly good local service by commercial broadcasting stations has been diminishing over the past decade -- badly!

Hopefully, more citizens will contact their U.S. Senators to urge support of S.2332. It's an important piece of legislation that can have a positive impact on media services in this country. Learn more about media consolidation at my earlier postings about the FCC.


December 15, 2007

Fun on the Web

-
Some people are just more industrious than the rest of us.

Of course, having talent and honing their skills are traits you’ll usually find in such achievers – and I’ve happened upon a fellow who falls in to that category.

Meet Don Edrington, a Californian who is right up there with Walter Bent among the people I admire for their ingenuity, resourcefulness, and industriousness. (More about Walt Bent another time!)

I found Don’s web site after Googling for one-time CBS Radio star Jack Kirkwood, whom a few of you might remember from the 1940s.

Unlike my good friend Walt Bent, whom Karen and I met about 30 years ago in Stillwater, Oklahoma, we’ve not had the pleasure of meeting Don Edrington. But his web site speaks volumes about his range of interests and his enthusiasm.

If you like “music with a melody” from the ‘40s, ‘50s, 60’s and 70s, you’ll find a wide variety of tunes on Don’s web site.


If you enjoy great storytelling, you’re sure to like Don’s glimpses into yesteryear, when he sold newspapers on the streets of Hollywood.

And if you’re a “senior” citizen with an interest in technology – but find it just a bit overwhelming at times – Don Edrington can help you steer your way around and over the brick walls of technological gobbledygook.

Here’s the link to Don's music pages at the
The Senior Computer Tutor web site.

Let me know if you enjoy it as much as I have. Enjoy!

December 12, 2007

What's in a Name?



A tip of the hat to Lorraine Collins of Spearfish, who has allowed us to use the following column, which originally appeared in the Black Hills Pioneer.
-----------------------
The recent discussion of whether Hooker Street in Whitewood should be renamed because of unsavory connotations for the term made me think of some other renaming events in our area over the last couple of decades. The first thing that came to mind was the renaming of an elementary school in Belle Fourche a number of years ago. One of the well known, respected, longtime businessmen in Belle Fourche was named Tom Gay. Mr. Gay owned property on the hill in the north part of town and he eventually donated land for a city park, which became Gay Park. When an elementary school was built there, it became Gay Park School.

As time went on and language changed, you can see how a certain uneasiness about the name developed. The school district finally decided to change the name of the school to North Park School. This did, after all, reflect its location and it balanced with the South Park School on the other end of town. But some local citizens were outraged that the name of an honorable man and benefactor was no longer acceptable in that town. Why let other people’s definition of a word take over a respected citizen’s name?

There was a different sort of controversy in Rapid City in the last decade or so, also involving the name of an elementary school, but not because of the change in our language. This was more about the change in the way we perceive our history. The school was named for Annie Tallent, who was “the first white woman in the Black Hills,” coming with the Gordon expedition in 1874. She taught school and was the first superintendent of schools in Pennington County. Annie Tallent also wrote a book called “The Black Hills or the Last Hunting Ground of the Dacotahs.” This is what eventually got her reputation in trouble. In that book, Annie, as a product of her times, had some quite harsh and bigoted things to say about Indians, referring to them as “savages.” She enthusiastically endorsed the prevailing view that “the only good Indian is a dead Indian.”

The question became, was it a good idea to have a school named for a woman who had such racist views? It was decided not, so the name of the school was changed. While I could understand that, I did wonder whether Annie Tallent was being judged more harshly than quite a few other early pioneers. Because she was a teacher, maybe she is held to a higher standard by historians than is, say, a general in the army. Streets, towns, mountains and counties around here are named for men who, if they did not defame Indians, often slaughtered them. We have the towns of Custer, Miles City, Sheridan, Sturgis, Camp Crook and Crook County in Wyoming. We have mountains named for Harney, Terry, Custer. Those who conquer the land get to name the landmarks.

General Joseph Hooker may not be as famous out here in the west as these other fellows, but in terms of naming things for generals, I suppose he deserves at least a street somewhere. (The longstanding rumor that the present connotation of “hooker” came about because of his personal conduct has been debunked several times.) The present controversy does give us a chance to rethink things, though, in terms of what our history is and how we tell it. The monuments we build, the landmarks we name, the stories we tell our school children do influence how we define what’s important to us. So, what’s in a name?

In several cities, I’ve driven down Martin Luther King Avenue but I’d be interested to know if anybody has ever been on a street called, for instance, Susan B. Anthony Blvd, or Elizabeth Cady Stanton Avenue, or how about Mother Teresa Way? Anne Morrow Lindberg Circle? Or, more historic, Abigail Adams Street? The only landmark I can think of at the moment that’s named for a woman is on the outskirts of Phoenix, AZ. It’s called Piestewa Peak, renamed from “Squaw Peak” after Lori Piestewa was killed in Iraq, the first Native American woman soldier killed in combat. It was a good change, I think.

------------------------------------
Lorraine Collins is a free-lance journalist from Spearfish.

December 11, 2007

Asleep at the Switch?

Like many folks, I’ve basked in the glow of glasnost for the past few years. Even with the ascent of ex-KGB agent Vladimir Putin, I was not overly concerned. And it’s been interesting to witness the recovery of the Russian economy.

I didn’t even pay attention – nor did most mainstream media – when Defense News reported that the Russians had indicated last summer
that they planned to reassert their military presence near the perimeter of NATO countries.

Last Thursday, however, I was startled to read a simple four-line report in the Wall Street Journal that said:
Russia sent an aircraft-carrier group to the Mediterranean, part of efforts to expand its military presence and flex its economic might.

I found nothing more in the Journal and jumped to the New York Times on-line, where I found
one short article.

The most
comprehensive information I located was contained in Defense Update, an on-line publication headquartered in the United Kingdom. It notes that the aircraft carrier Kuznetsov, which leads the 11-ship group, will work out of a Syrian port. The Israelis apparently have expressed concerns that Iranian submarines also may soon be serviced by the Syrian port facilities at Tartous.

It will be interesting to see how much play – if any – this turn of events gets in U.S. media.

December 9, 2007

Had Your Identity Stolen.....YET?

-
AN OPEN LETTER TO SOUTH DAKOTA LEGISLATORS

Jane Kim wrote an excellent article a couple of months ago for the Wall Street Journal, noting that “increasing numbers of people are taking a radical approach to thwart criminals: they are putting their credit reports on permanent freeze.” Take a look at her piece right here.

Freezing access to credit reports from the major credit bureaus is a meaningful way that consumers can help protect themselves from identity theft -- especially for those who are retired and no longer seeking more and more credit.

According to
Consumer Reports, which is a prime player in helping consumers, victims of identity theft can have their reports frozen at no cost, if they have a police report to prove it. However, the rest of us in South Dakota have to pay $10 to put such a freeze in place, to temporarily lift such a freeze, or remove it altogether. For elderly consumers on fixed incomes – trying to protect themselves from the growing threat of identity theft – these mounting fees can be extremely burdensome.

Our friends in North Dakota passed a law limiting such charges to $5 per request.

But Nebraska has done even better. The Nebraska Credit Report Protection Act requires there be only a one-time $15 fee to freeze the report. There are no additional fees for lifting the freeze temporarily or removing it altogether.

Lots of stuff going on in Pierre next month; let’s hope this issue can find a place on the legislative agenda.

December 4, 2007

Courage of Your Convictions


Good neighbor Lorraine Collins is a free-lance journalist. She and her husband Keith have lived the world over -- including Singapore and London -- but now they're retired and back home in South Dakota. They live in Spearfish. Lorraine was kind enough to let us use one of her recent columns from the Black Hills Pioneer.

-------------------------------------

A while ago I received a phone call from a fellow who had read something I wrote in this paper. He said liked what I had to say, and then he went on to discuss various things in the community that he was unhappy about. “What did you say your name was?” I asked. “I didn’t say,” he answered. Then he said he was writing a letter to the City Council about some of these things but he wasn’t going to sign it because he had some relatives who might get in trouble if he did. He sent me a copy of the letter but there was no return address.

In a sense, this fellow, right-minded person though he may be, is in my opinion just like the guy who arranged to give $750,000 to State Senator Roger Hunt to fight a ballot initiative campaign, but who now is hiding behind what may be a loop hole in the law. He is reported to be afraid of “violence” if anyone knows who he is. The issue he opposed concerned abortion rights, and I watched that campaign closely. I don’t recall that there was ever any violence. Once I did attend a meeting that featured the Rapid City doctor who was supporting abortion rights, and as a precaution the sponsoring group asked that a policeman be nearby, just in case. There was a brief and very discreet police presence, but it wasn’t needed. One man showed up to argue against the doctor, but he was definitely not violent. This doctor had endured weeks of pickets in front of his office, which must have been unpleasant, but he never came to harm because of publicly stating his convictions.

In that same campaign, I also observed an event on the BHSU campus when some anti-abortion people from out of state came in their bus and set up a big display, so people who disagreed with them organized their own group to oppose them. There the two opposing forces stood, a few yards apart. Now and then the local supporters of abortion rights would go over to talk to the people who came on the bus, and there seemed to be vigorous discussion, but there was certainly no violence.

So, I wonder, just what is that anonymous guy with all the money afraid of? And also, what is the fellow who called me afraid of? Believe it or not, I do know how hard it is sometimes to speak one’s mind. It can be scary, and uncomfortable, but after a pretty long time of speaking my mind and sometimes being nervous, I can report that I have never felt in danger of my life, or even my living.

Many years ago I saw a sign in a store that said, “I have to make money from my friends, because my enemies don’t come in here.” This may have been a subtle way of telling us not to ask for a discount just because we knew the owner or belonged to the same church or lodge, but it also accepted the fact that perhaps those who were of a different opinion, religion, political affiliation, might avoid doing business there unless they had to, and the shop owner realized that. He accepted it.

Journalists do get murdered, but not, except for one or two spectacular cases in the last forty years, in the United States. Political leaders and opposition members do get murdered, but not in South Dakota. We in this nation and this state and this county do not have much to fear from those who don’t agree with us. In many countries around the world people do die because of their adherence to their beliefs. We’ve seen the image of the young man standing in front of a tank in Tiananmen Square. We’ve seen people under house arrest in Burma, imprisoned in South America, tortured in many countries because they disagreed with the people in power. Compared to that, just what do we have to fear in South Dakota or Lawrence County? Not much.

My name is Lorraine Collins. I believe in the First Amendment. I encourage all of us to use it, and to have the courage of our convictions.


------------------------------------------------------


Lorraine Collins is a free-lance journalist and lives in Spearfish.


December 3, 2007

Faith and Politics

In my sheltered life, I’ve never heard Presbyterians called the “frozen chosen,” I didn’t care that Jack Kennedy was Catholic, and I have little interest in campaign attempts to nail down matters of faith among political candidates.

Peggy Noonan’s Declarations column in the Wall Street Journal last month (November 24-24) – entitled "People Before Prophets" – shares her take on the subject. It’s right on target and worth a read. She acknowledges the importance of faith, but suggests that we may be over-reaching in neatly assigning candidates a seal of approval.

Faith can be a bit elusive. As Ms. Noonan writes about political candidates, “It is impossible for us to know their hearts. It’s barely possible to know your own. Faith is important, but it’s also personal.”

Amen.