November 8, 2010

Rush to make history

by Larry Miller

Like long-time Spearfish resident and historian Linfred Schuttler, we're pleased that Mayor Jerry Krambeck and  other members of the city council were interested in having a video produced that covers the history of Spearfish.

We're disappointed but not surprised that the Mayor would push to have the video produced by an out-of-town company that is owned by a long-time friend of the Mayor.

The rationale seemed to be that the Lead company "Historical Footprints" owns a lot of old film footage of Spearfish, and that -- therefore -- it should be a "sole source" contract with no opportunity for others to bid on it.  That should not have been allowed.  There's at least one company IN Spearfish that has the credentials and capability of producing a top-flight video production, but they and others were never even given a chance.

We've seen some of the "Historical Footprints" footage of Spearfish.  While it would be helpful in telling the story of Spearfish, that alone should not have driven the project.  With the talented Paul Higbee scripting the project, we have a feeling that the narrative will be well researched, but we believe the video production could have been better done by Western Sky Media in Spearfish.  But none of us will never know, because the contract was awarded without competitive bidding.

And without any input from two organizations that you would think might have a keen interest in such a project:  the Spearfish Area Historical Society and the city's own Historic Preservation Commission.

We look forward to seeing the video, but we're sorely disappointed in the process that will deliver the product.

November 4, 2010

Get it right

In case you missed his "Letter to the Editor" in the Black Hills Pioneer last Saturday (10/30/10), this piece penned by long-time Spearfish resident and historian Linfred Schuttler is well worth a read:

GET IT RIGHT

The City Council and interested citizens are planning a historical video of Spearfish to be ready for the “125th anniversary in 2013.”

The idea is great, but good heavens, let’s get the dates right.

Spearfish was established in 1876 by a town site declaration and survey made May 29, 1876, with occupancy effective May 30, 1876.   The legality of town site organization was effected under provisions of a law of the United States which authorized the location of town sites on government un-surveyed lands, which also set aside portions of such lands for school purposes.   The Spearfish town site document was signed by 32 founding stockholders, with at least three having descendants still living here.

Subsequent surveys confirmed the location and the town site plats which still exist as part of the present city records and maps.

On Feb. 28, 1877, President Grant signed the order abrogating the Sioux Treaty, which put all lands under territorial and county control and jurisdiction.

The town site came under county control, but few services were offered by the county.

On March 12, 1885, a charter of incorporation, under a board of trustees, was granted to the “city of Spearfish.”  Three years later, under a new territorial law permitting the adoption of a mayoral and aldermanic organization of local government, Spearfish voted, in a somewhat tainted election process, to adopt a new charter which still exists today.

If the last charter date of 1888 is accepted as the establishment of a city, then Rapid City, Sturgis and Hot Springs would be less than 60 years old.


If the last charter date is accepted, then what happened to history in the years previous?

Judge W. W. Bradley proclaimed Spearfish as the “Queen City” on July 4, 1877, because it was to be the best and leader of the rest.

Linfred L. Schuttler
Spearfish

November 3, 2010

What really matters

by Lorraine Collins

Whew! It's finally over! What a thrill! Oh no, I don't mean the election, which some may think of as more thrilling than others. I mean that enthralling rescue of miners in Chile last month. By now the rapt attention of the world has moved on to other dramas, but that event will live in song and story---television documentaries, movies, paperback books.

The first documentary about the rescue aired on PBS a few days ago. It showed the giant machines that were brought in to pound a hole through the rock and the men who worked so desperately. What a triumph of science and faith, technology and spirit, courage and teamwork it was. It also demonstrated government efficiency and innovation and an apparent willingness to share credit for the success. It's everything we long for here in America and we saw it for a few weeks there in Chile. The rescue also showcased American inventiveness and knowhow as American equipment and expertise were substantially involved in the rescue. So that makes us feel even better about it.

I guess you could say that what happened in Chile was the antipathy of what we've experienced here at home during the long, rancorous election season. The rescue of the miners cost a whole lot of money but maybe not as much as was spent by candidates in California. Or not as much as was lost by those big banks that were too big to fail.

In the midst of all the drama, one of the commentators who filled the television screens and airwaves during the rescue of the miners said something that I had not heard for a long time, but I think is still true. He reminded us that all wealth comes from two things only---mining and agriculture. Without mining and agriculture, it is said, nothing else exists. It's a primitive idea, perhaps, and one nobody thinks about. But if you wear it, sit on it, eat it, drive it, read it, watch it or use it to talk to somebody half a world away, whatever you are using would not be there for you unless somebody had dug a mineral out of the ground or grown a crop. That's where it starts.

Of course, a lot of other procedures have to go on after the initial production or extraction of the basic material, such as processing, refining, inventing, designing, manufacturing and marketing. All this leads, somehow, to banks, lawyers, corporations, hedge funds, speculation, bubbles, and Wall Street bankers who get millions of dollars in bonuses no matter what. Somehow, all those people who seem to have nothing whatever to do with mining and agriculture appear to be the guys with all the money. It kind of makes you wonder.

Our economic system seems to reward best those who are far removed from the basic source of all wealth---mining and agriculture. The only time we actually pay much attention to miners is when they are involved in a catastrophe that captures our imagination. And the only time we think much about those who toil in the fields is when we're wondering whether or not they're illegal aliens.

 There are easier ways to make a living than mining and agriculture so we should be grateful for those who are willing to do the work. The men who were trapped in that mine haven't spoken much about the experience yet, but they've said they realized what was important, what really mattered to them, and so did their families waiting for the rescue.

 The rest of us should stop and think of this, too. What really matters to the economic health of the nation? What are we producing, manufacturing, inventing other than complicated financial instruments that nobody really seems to understand?  If we thought about that a little more, we might not be in the mess we're in.


Lorraine Collins is a writer who lives in Spearfish. She can be reached at collins1@rushmore.com